SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (5771)3/30/2002 3:19:27 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) of 21057
 
I go back to the posted relevant rule (below):

The focus is on the revelation of intimate, personal or private information about other posters.

or *posting* PMs containing such intimate, personal or private information about other posters.

or threatening to PMs containing such intimate, personal or private information about other posters.

or alluding to the existence of PMs containing such intimate, personal or private information about other posters.
----------------------------------------
Agreed that a PM is private communication, but it does not follow that it is per se Personal Information.

The question then becomes the allusion to a PM that contains "private information". And that a threat in PM is considered "private information" and that it is on par with "cyberflirtation". Considering the context, I am going to concede the argument.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News