SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 200.46-17.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yousef who wrote (75900)3/30/2002 7:06:35 AM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Yousef: The FACT is ... UMC is behind INTC at .13um on 200mm OR 300mm.

I don't disagree with you. UMC (and TSMC, for that matter) is behind INTC on .13µm (for MPUs). No question about it.

However, they have both been gaining rapidly on the industry leaders in recent years. Taking this into consideration, AMD has to make a choice:

- Go it alone. Develop their own MPU process with no partners.

- Continue with Motorola as a development partner.

- Switch to UMC with a deal that (apparently) grants AMD the IP even though the companies split the development costs.

So the question is (and I really am interested in what you think here):

Is AMD worse off with UMC as a process development partner than they were (are) with Motorola?

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext