SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Derivatives: Darth Vader's Revenge

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (1075)4/2/2002 2:36:12 AM
From: JBTFD  Read Replies (2) of 2794
 
Here is an excerpt from S&P's Nov report on ENE:

"Overview - 12-NOV-01 Key Stock Statistics
Although third quarter results from operations were in line with analyst expectations (including ours), issues that emerged during the company’s conference call had a dramatic negative impact on the stock price. First of all, ENE incurred a $1.1 billion charge related to impairment of certain assets and investments in unconsolidated businesses, its broadband business, and in related party transactions. In addition, it recorded a $1.2 billion charge to shareholders’ equity as a result of termination of certain related party transactions. These actions led the SEC to launch a formal investigation of ENE’s third-party dealings."

Both of the above mentioned problems were derivatives related. The announcement of those problems caused the stock to go from the mid 30's to around 5, over a period of a month or so. It also resulted in downgrades on Enron's debt ratings.

I do not buy at all your statement that ENE's problems had nothing to do with derivatives.

Also, according to S&P Enron's 3rd Q revenue 2001 was $47 Billion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext