Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 39.82

-3.8%

11:55 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: willcousa who wrote (163386)	4/3/2002 8:33:14 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: So Duron will go all the way from 1600+ to 2000+ on about 40 mhz of improvement Considering that you all thought it was great that when Intel went from PIII 1000 to P4 1300 and there was a huge drop in performance, I'd ask why you weren't screaming foul at Intel? AMD is just following the market "leader" that sets expectations for the performance of a given model number. Intel's model 2000 runs a 4x100 FSB, a 1000 (full speed "every other clock") cache connection, some 2000 ALUs and some 1/2 width 4000 ALUs. And they call it a 2000. AMD calls their chip with a 2x133 FSB, 1667 ALU that outperforms Intel's 2000 a 2000. Notice that the review sites that pander to Intel had to compare an AMD 2000+ to a P4 2400 to get the P4 to look as good as the AMD. Then they whined about the model number 2000+ not being faster than Intel's 2400.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next