Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Chas. who wrote (413)	4/3/2002 5:26:44 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (2) of 613

Just saw some footage of the TWG.t gems on ROBtv,...they are getting some promotion,...good pictures of the colored ones too. The tardiness of Hermann to get comparative valuations of the package is puzzling. A diamondaire would take a few minutes to evaluate the clear ones because there are no big ones to slow the examination down. The colored ones might take a little longer to evaluate. One is left thinking Hermann's buddy diamondaire and partner, has told him they can't promote the valuation so they should hope the market doesn't notice its absence. Something to consider when thinking about grade,... Most DMS plants are set up with a 0.5 to 2.0 mm cutoff. Problem is that diamonds less than 3.0 mm in the average plant are not recovered efficiently. Most plants will get everything over 3.0 mm very efficiently (near 100%), but recoveries of diamonds at 2.0 mm for instance usually are less than 50%. So when your determining grade, investors would be wise to ignore anything less than 2.0 mm mesh size, because such diamonds are not worth much in the first place, and they most likely end up in the tailings pile.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next