THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dayuhan who wrote (6690)	4/3/2002 11:24:03 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) of 21057

Actually, your original plan (to bring the Israeli and Palestinians to the US) is flawed: they, or a large chunk ot "they", quite enough to cause endless future trouble, won't leave. That piece of geography has significance to them that NYC and Berkeley (are you SURE we can't find someplace else- -say in the PI :-) ) can never have. So you're left with leaving them there or shooting them. Bad PR. I still think the cheapest way would simply be to subsidize the Palestinians in situ. Ah, if only things were so simple. I don't think it would be as expensive as it sounds. Think again. As soon as the US gov't does that, every liberal cause in the US is going to scream for their share. "Before you're subsidize those damn foreigners, you're first responsibility should be helping <substitute for favorite minority or allegedly oppressed group in the US>". Incredibly expensive. you can threaten to withdraw the subsidies if the leaders don't behave. You can get away with that once, maybe twice. After that, those leaders are going to come up with an answer. It may consist of sitting on the necks of their people and doing what they want anyway, but they'll have an answer. Better fire up the US jets.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next