SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.11+3.9%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (76442)4/3/2002 11:38:57 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Pete,

Why do those in the know pull their Intel servers and replaced them with Athlon servers? Because they were faster, cheaper and more reliable.

Cheaper? yes, faster?, I think so, more reliable? they still need more track record, so let's not jump ahead of ourselves.

As far as clusters of 2 way vs. 4+ way, there are some problems that are better addressed by a multi CPU computer rather than a cluster of 1 or 2 way, mainly databases. So there is room in the market for them.

But at the speed of performance increases of CPUs, a 1 or 2 way server is satisfactory for greater and greater percentage of problems, leaving the real need for >2 systems ever shrinking need. Note that I said real. There was a research done (I wish I saved the link) about what people buy vs. what they need in servers, and the result was that people vasty overestimated the real need with their hardware purchases. They bought far more powerful servers than they needed, and they vastly overspent compared to what they needed to spend. The study was done about 6 to 12 months ago, and still during the .com server buying feeding frenzy.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext