SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.15-0.6%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (163609)4/6/2002 5:11:33 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Combjelly, Re: "Intel tends to lay things out at a lower level than AMD does, the "individually hand-crafted transistor" approach as opposed to the "tinkertoy" approach. The benefit of doing that is they tend to have a smaller die, lower power and likely can squeeze more out of a given architecture on a particular process than AMD can. The downside, there is going to be more errata because it's harder to verify."

I'll let one of the experts answer this with more certainty, but from looking at what you write here, it does not sound in the least bit correct to me. Are you really familiar with Intel's and AMD's CPU design approach, or did you perhaps speak without thinking (something that I do myself sometimes, so do not construe this question to mean that I am being confrontational with you)?

wbmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext