Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (23866)	4/8/2002 5:50:54 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<Ayatollah Rafsanjani told cheering crowds assembled for him in Tehran recently that the moment Iran had nuclear weapons, it would use them on Israel. They even cheered when he casually acknowledged that millions of Muslims would die in the reply. > If that's true, then it's a declaration of war and it's time to nuke him first. Such crazed, insane and superstitious Mad Moslem Mullahs make the wacko Chosen People seem sensible. Who says he said it? Maybe it's just a vicious rumour - people do make things up. But if he did say it, then there's a good chance he'll do what he says he'll do. Axis of Evil sounds about right to me. Maybe GeorgeW should announce an intended nuclear strike on Iran unless there is unconditional surrender. If they don't unconditionally surrender, start the Hiroshima- Nagasaki-Isfahan-Teheran process until they come to their senses and wave the white flag. They could give a week's warning to everyone to leave town somewhere then do a demonstration so that Iranians could inspect the remains to see what might happen if they don't surrender as suggested. But it would be better to first find out if they are serious about nuking Israel. Mq

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next