Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (23883)	4/8/2002 12:12:34 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) of 281500

In addition, some Bushies were angered when Sharon on Apr. 3 refused to let U.S. Middle East envoy Anthony Zinni meet with Arafat. At that point, some inside the Administration became convinced that Sharon wants only to eradicate Arafat as a political force, rather than to persuade him to control terrorism in Palestinian territory. I guess said Bushies haven't been listening real closely for the past 6 months or so. Not to mention that they seem to have no knowledge whatsoever about Lebanon '82 and the effectiveness of American jawboning there. I don't expect things to get much better, given that the only clear reason I can see that W has any interest in the situation is to line things up for the Iraq invasion. Given my own views on how well thought out the current administration Iraq scenario is, and how likely it would be for it to go according to plan, I figure it's all just as well. One thing the local "Arab Mind" types might consider is just how strong W is going to look after Sharon kicks him around for a few more weeks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next