SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.980+1.0%3:03 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (19409)4/8/2002 5:01:04 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (3) of 34857
 
hoping it won't be one more of those cdmaOne is REALLY 5x GSM fantasies.

While I dont think that anybody is ever going to agree on the exact efficiency of CDMA over GSM, I think I can see how IJ gets to 5x GSM (or at least close).

I've probably been reading these threads since about the beginning of '98, and my understanding has always been that CDMA was 6-9x more spectrally efficient than AMPS. The GSM-TDMA family was estimated to be 3-4x AMPS.

However, looking back....the 6-9x estimate was BEFORE the implementation of EVRC by the US operators (it may have been implemented in Korea). I think that EVRC was supposed to give something like a 60% capacity increase.

If you take the high-end of the estimate for CDMA spectral efficiency (9x) and the low-end for GSM (3x), the EVRC version of CDMA would be 4.8x more spectrally efficient than GSM.

Has GSM instituted any new CODEC's since '98? I have no idea if AMR is the first new codec since the original GSM implementations.

Slacker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext