SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Clarke who wrote (13479)4/10/2002 4:31:17 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) of 23908
 
Talking of realignment, isn't it stupefying to watch how psycho Sharon keeps botching it?? I mean, it's really beyond me: the Israelis could have relied on the best sugar daddy around: Uncle Sam, a sympathetic, candid, rich self-made man living in America but guess what... those crazy Israelis are gonna trade him for that Russky bumpkin, Uncle Joe!! Can you believe it?? Uncle Joe and his gallery of European rogues!! It really baffles me....

Sharon insults America
The New York Times The New York Times
Wednesday, April 10, 2002


The announcement Monday night that the Israeli military was pulling out of two Palestinian cities was welcome, but it was far from clear that it signaled the start of the full, immediate withdrawal from the West Bank towns and refugee camps repeatedly requested by President George W. Bush.

Earlier in the day, Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon, brushed off Bush's demand in a defiant speech to the Knesset, insisting that the campaign would end only when its mission had been accomplished.

Perhaps Sharon does not understand. The president of the United States, speaking out of profound friendship and growing impatience, has asked him to withdraw "without delay." This was not a request made lightly.

Bush has expressed sympathy with Israel's plight and made clear that its security and well-being are of the highest concern. He has sent his secretary of state to the region to try to end the bloodshed. Yet Sharon says he will remove the tanks and troops whenever it suits him. This is an insult to Bush and the United States.

Sharon, who has always felt that others lacked his courage and conviction and whose career in the army was marked by defiance of Israel's leaders, has fallen into old patterns. Historians may debate whether his previous acts displayed bravery or foolishness, but there can be little doubt that he is doing his country no good by failing to heed the sincere and urgent request of Israel's closest ally.

It is increasingly clear that the costs to broader Israeli interests far outweigh whatever short-term security benefits this military operation may be yielding. Sharon's actions may be netting some terrorists and some of the terrible tools they employ, but they are inflaming the fury of thousands more Palestinians and millions of Arabs whose governments are being asked by Bush to press for more responsible [Israeli] leadership.

The prestige of the United States is on the line in an effort to help Israel, and the Israeli government is doing nothing to make the job easier.

The military operations, Israel's largest in the West Bank since it first occupied the area nearly 35 years ago, came in response to the attack by a suicide bomber on a Passover Seder in Netanya last month. Israel's declared objective is to dismantle the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure, but Sharon has also targeted leaders and offices of the Palestinian Authority. Israeli gunfire, curfews and military checkpoints have abused the lives, livelihood and dignity of the civilian population.

Sharon says he needs more time to destroy the terrorist network. Israeli forces, however, have already badly damaged the Palestinian civilian infrastructure, with supplies of water, food and medicine disrupted, independent television shut down and residents trapped in their homes. More than 200 Palestinians have been killed and more than 1,500 wounded since Israeli tanks and helicopter gunships rolled into the West Bank on March 29.

The refusal of Israeli forces to let wounded Palestinians be removed to hospitals is inexplicable. It is also true that the Arab states have reacted shamefully to Bush's efforts. He asked them to condemn Palestinian terrorism and make clear that suicide bombers are murderers, not martyrs. There has been no response. King Mohammed VI of Morocco, greeting Powell in Casablanca on Monday, asked the American why he had not gone directly to Jerusalem, as if the Arabs had nothing to account for. In Bahrain, the American ambassador is the focus of fierce protests because at a mock United Nations session there for students he requested that, along with a moment of silence for Palestinian victims, a moment be observed for Israelis as well.

Powell's Mideast mission was never going to be easy. Even before the Israeli invasion, Arab leaders refused to denounce Palestinian suicide bombings. Arafat still refuses to call on his people to give up violence. A wise Israeli leader would use the Bush initiative to show that he stands ready to talk peace with any responsible partner. Instead, Sharon embarrasses Bush and gives the Arabs easy excuses.

iht.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext