A nice system you've come up with, using zero crossovers, adding StochRSI and adusting some of the moving averages for the second part of BradCCI. You've been bizzy. Bill S., Wolfgang, Chan, Paul, Claud, etc., are going to be pleased to see your work! It looks like you really did some tinkering with this part:
(Mov(Std(((h+l+c)/3),28),5,s) <mov(Std(((h+l+c)/3),34), 20, s))
Why 20? Did you choose it because of the results it generated, or because of something you knew about moving averages? Be forewarned, though: A lot of Fib fans will rush to change it to 21. And why did you choose to change 28 to 34 in the second part, instead of just fiddling with the 20? I'm very curious -- it's wonderful to see this formula begin to take shape. |
