SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mr. Whist who wrote (247377)4/12/2002 6:24:44 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
"The Repugs should have pondered your words when they went after President Clinton for the sole purpose of tarnishing his popularity."

You just saying it doesn't make it so. This is a perfect example to prove my point that you think it is ok to cheat and lie and break the law if you are a dem. Clinton paid an $850,000 settlement for one of his crimes (sexual harrasment), got disbarred from the state of Arkansas, disallowed by the Supreme Court to ever argue a case in the Supreme Court (for perjury), and as I said in the Whitewater investigation there is plenty there, or there would not have been over 10 convictions, including Clinton's succesor at Governor. Not to mention a suicide of one of the guys who would have had to hide the evidence (conveniently Hilary did that for your pal) and a $400,000 kick-back to another.

And you say that is the same as an idiot congressmwoman making a baseless and outrageous claim (allowing the murder of thousands of Americans is a pretty strong charge imo). You feel they should spend money to investigate.

This is also why I have NO RESPECT for you OR people with your feeble mindset. And it is another reason why it appears to me that you hate America. You feel that peole should be investigated with no evidence if you don't like them. I thought you dems were against prosecutorial abuse. What a laugher.

I noticed how your friend Tiger Paw ridiculed my opinion that there was a difference in principals between our views. Why don't you SPECIFICALLY show what principal is involved with your feeling that Bush should be investigated. I know you can show NONE, but like to point out your weak thinking and baseless accusations to new people on the thread.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News