E.T., do you have a rational reason why they "must" share Jerusalem? When Jerusalem was under Israeli control access to all the holy sites of all religions was provided without hindrance, when it was under Arab (Jordanian control) it was not. By that act, they could have lost the right to control any part of Jerusalem, at least, some rational people could advance that argument.
What is so holy in Jerusalem to the Arab that when they pray, they show jerusalem their butts (while all Jews face Jerusalem when they Pray). Jerusale is not mentioned in the Kuran even once, it wasnever an Arab, or even a provincial Ottoman capital, surely it was never the Capital of "Palestine". Just because Arafat says he wants Jerusalem? Do you realize that that demand was there only hoping that Brak will have to turn it down, and when Barak did not, what happened. I think that the policy should be what Clinton offer was, has been good for two days, (that is why it was not put in writing), and now any other offer will be less. And the longer it takes Arafat to come to its sense, the smaller the offer should be. Arafat MUST understand that time is not on his side.
Zeev
Zeev |
