SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SilentZ who wrote (144871)4/13/2002 5:08:14 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1573824
 
In all fairness, he never said that the Palestinian attacks were not terrorism. Of course, he says the Israeli ones are, and I'd have to disagree with him, except for when it comes to the dictionary definition of "terrorism".

My definition of "terrorism" is the intentional harming of civilians, but officially, that ain't it. Maybe we need a new word.

Z, what is wrong with the dictionary definition? I think anytime humans cause terror in other humans, its a form of terrorism. If we accepted that definition, we would be less inclined to war with each other.

Its terror that the people who went through 9/11 are dealing with now......its called post traumatic stress syndrome. And its PTSS that the non Taliban Afghans who survived the US bombings are going through now as well. Both were innocent but nonetheless both are paying the price of terror inspiring actions. It can take years to recover, and many won't.

I am not a pacifist per se but I see little that war accomplishes.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News