SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3351)4/16/2002 2:00:26 PM
From: Keith Fauci  Read Replies (1) of 3536
 
I believe the WTO and NAFTA both move us in the direction of the European Union and am therefore against both. I do not believe Bush needs fast-track approval either. Your first article explains why, the WTO could eliminate legislation that gives primacy to economic efficiency regardless of environmental or other impact. All they would have to do is find regulations "more burdensome than necessary" Of course "unlike congressional, regulatory and court proceedings WTO disputes and submitted evidence are closed to the public and records sealed." This does not even sound ethically or morally sound yet alone legally. "Fast-track minimizes consent by minimizing debate. Fast-track marginalizes, perhaps eliminates consent, by making U.S. law subject to international law, that is, subject to lawmakers from Communist, Socialist, fascist and Islamic fundamentalist nations that hate us." It is up to everyone who reads this to call their congressmen and senators to oppose HR 3005.

newsmax.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News