Hi enigma. You said..." lorne, If this sort of thing will help keep the Palestinians in check, and allow us to monitor their activities better, that is a slight plus, but I do not believe it will be very effective. The Palestinians, as most of those Middle Eastern nations of Islam, are very sneaky, and such and they turn such an agreement around to their advantage."...
The USA has said many times they will not negotiate with terrorists yet to make any deals with arafat is to deal with one of the worlds biggest terrorist and the whole world knows he is a terrorist. Why must the USA and others defend arafat. Why not eliminate him and get a human to speak for the palestinians. To deal with this filth is to legitimize terrorist and will only create more.
--------------------------------------
..." The routine waiver of a 1987 anti-terrorism law essentially certifies that the PLO is not a terrorist organization. "....
...." "I think, when we're trying to get people together to negotiate on the terms of a lasting cease-fire, as well as a comprehensive settlement, to be calling each other names, even if they're accurate names, is not psychologically helpful," Hyde, R-Ill., said on CNN on Sunday.
"So I think, if that could be deferred or avoided, it doesn't mean that you're surrendering to terrorists or mollifying them, but it means you understand the realities of how to get from here to there."
ap.tbo.com |
