SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (9615)4/18/2002 10:23:43 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
the territory partitioned as Israel had a Jewish majority, formed under accepted rules of emigration, that had not illegally expropriated anyone, and had, in fact, developed much of the land

"Accepted rules of emigration" meaning rules accepted by whom? Certainly not the resident population of Palestine.

The expropriations may not have been illegal, but they were no less shattering for that, and it didn't help that they were conducted under the aegis of a foreign occupying power. It is very important to remember, when looking at land purchases, that the overwhelming majority of the land sold was not sold by the tillers of the land. These were tenanted estates, and traditionally the tenants changed hands with the land, simply paying their rents (a percentage of the crop) to the new owners. When the estates were bought by Jewish settlers, the tenant farmers were simply, brutally, and legally evicted. They ended up in urban shanty towns, and became the first generation of Palestinian refugees. They were, of course, easy pickings for anyone who wanted to incite violence against the settlers.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext