Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tekboy who wrote (25896)	4/18/2002 1:59:22 PM
From: LLLefty	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>>>>tb@waffle.com <<< I don't think you supplied sufficient guidance to the poor fellow who has difficulty making up his mind. From what I've seen of his postings, he's a perfect match for the Guardian. Tt may clear up some of the greys and ambiguities he manufactures. The Guardian has no such problems. Some of my best English and Scots friends and in-laws wouldn't start their day without reading it. As I am, they are all for the poor and the oppressed, who, btw, prefer buying the tabloids. The Guardian hasn't found much to like about American presidents except for JFK. It thinks it, with an assist from the Foreign Office, would do a better job of running the world (replacing the Times) if only we would listen to them. >>>>there's a difference between things it reports as news and things it publishes as opinion pieces.<<<< Just from what I've seen posted here in the last weeks, I tend to think they've erased whatever line may or may not have existed. A form of journalistic malice seems to have become the driver.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next