THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Poet who wrote (9748)	4/18/2002 7:11:39 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) of 21057

I have been peeking in from time to time but have missed the thrust of that argument. A couple of weeks ago, I think, somebody (maybe Bill?) said that stats had been posted earlier proving that gays were more likely to be pedophiles than straights. I never saw those posted, and have never seen them elsewhere. Is the argument about whether that has been established to be fact or not? Did someone post stats? What would it imply to those on this thread if stats were produced (and they were felt to be respectable stats)? I assume we're all in agreement that pedophiles shouldn't be priests. My inner ear is doing things to the room. I mean, it's jerking it around, trying to spin it in spite of the dramamine.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next