John, Richnorth's approach to "tell it like it is" does not seem
to agree with your and Dave's approach to defend the status quo
so that total control is not lost to control the future.
My approach is similiar to Richnorth's without me taking either side,
but to simply lay out facts that are relevant to "the deeds men do"
to explain "how we got here" with the message "of the day" that
"The status quo sucks, so how can we change it for the better."
Now you and Dave can ignore Richnorth for a few days here
and just use me as sometime to bounce your opinions off of
to see if the under-lining stuff you place your stuff on is solid
or weak or just plain wrong if it's purpose is to resolve a conflict,
or if its just to do battle using any means available, as in war,
which includes as first calamity victim, truth. So what do you
and Dave say? Collect my recent posts on the Middle East
and include those i mentioned i posted to Zeev on his Sack
to Jail thread, and lets discuss this situation from an avenue
to understand how planet Earth got here, and how to travel
to a place using a path different.
(or)
Continue like those on mainstream t.v. talk shows where each
side hears only their own words etc.
Your choice,
Walk a Talk
yes,
but first do a Talk not of a "war" Talk approach.
Move over, Finnegan's Wake. a.k.a. (or) a duh approach
of sand-witch i'am not interested in such a folly reply
ak |
