THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (9856)	4/18/2002 11:07:49 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 21057

If it is the job of a regulator to check and ensure a certain thing is running smoothly and it is. The job of a regulator is not to check and ensure that something runs smoothly. Its to check that someone or everyone is complying with regulation X that there department is assigned to enforce. If regulation X is based on bad idea Y, then they then the country might be better off if the regulators were paid to do nothing. If regulation X is based on good idea Z, but is no good at actually achieving the idea behind Z then the regulators might be very efficient at producing X, but X is relatively useless. A lot of the blame for problems like this should be put on congress not the regulatory agencies. If congress passes unclear, or useless, or even contradictory laws that isn't the fault of the agencies entrusted with enforcing the laws. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next