SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Final Frontier - Online Remote Trading
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Kim who wrote (10018)4/18/2002 11:40:37 PM
From: Dan Duchardt  Read Replies (2) of 12617
 
So explain how it is that disclosure is necessary as far back as 12 months ago because there might be some conflicting interests an investor needs to be aware of that might taint a recommendation, but after 13 months all that suddenly goes away. Why should they not now have to include disclosure of what they were doing 18 or 24 months or longer ago in any future releases they will issue? If it's important 12 months back, it's important farther back than that.

I agree this is not a settlement of wrongdoing which may involve fines or censure, but let's not pretend that what was going on 13 months ago (which according to the attorney general involved plenty of wrongdoing) is no longer relevant to present and future analyses. Let's see.. 13 months ago I lied through my teeth about this company to get you to buy their stock, but now I'm clean and I'm telling you the truth and I don't have to tell you anything about what I did 13 months ago. Too easy.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News