SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (77766)4/19/2002 1:50:48 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Pete,

The results I quoted was that of single Palomino on KT-266A based motherboard, with unbuffered. I took them from the first column, 1 process. Performance of single CPU systems did not change much when additional processes were added.

But my point was not to compare the relative performance of P4 and AXP, but to show how adding 256K of memory completely erased the IPC advantage AXP held, and P4 took lead in some areas. On this particular benchmark there was a 50% increase in performance. Further, my point was to show how misguided the idea of 256K Thoroughbred was.

The idea to save die space at expense of performance (and therefore reduce attractiveness) of the CPU, at the time AMD is able to sell not much more than half of the potential output just makes no sense.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext