THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (9928)	4/19/2002 2:55:07 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) of 21057

My whole point is that imo it is a dubious proposition for anyone to take a morally condemnatory stance against sexual acts engaged in and enjoyed by consenting, responsible adults. "Dubious" does not connote a very firm position. If your position is firm, then it must encompass sado-masochism in all its forms so long as consensual, as well as the numerous other examples that I see being mentioned here of, ah, "unconventional" sex. The idea of "consensual" could itself be the subject of long discussion. You mention pressure in your last paragraph, and heaven knows how much "consent" by women in hetero relationships, including even married couples, is tenuous at best. I don't believe you and I have any great problem with all of this. We each have our opinions, and I don't believe either of us disputes the right of the other to hold those opinions and to express them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next