Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (26047)	4/20/2002 2:42:25 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 281500

BTW, the world IS outraged at what is going on in the Sudan. Not so you'd really notice. Has the UN passed any anti-Khartoum resolutions lately? One difference is that most of the violence occurs in extremely remote places, without the eyes of the modern world being upon it. No TV cameras. Afghanistan is even more remote, and the TV cameras have managed to report from there quite a lot lately. May I suggest that the difference is the difficulty and danger of covering the story, not the remoteness of the location? I don't think the Khartoum regime is particularly reporter-friendly. Is it worth it just to cover another African basketcase, with no Biblical placenames and not a Jew in sight?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next