"Oh, there is one thing not to be believed about the Church. That is, that the gayness of the priesthood had anything to do with any of it. Priests assaulted boys because they were frustrated with their celibacy, not because they were gay"
The one thing priests say defines them is not their gayness, but their godliness. They are RC priests first: they are bald, short, fat, skinny, hetero, homo, or bisexual second.
Certainly, the popes, bishops, etc. of the RC church have a history of weird sexual proclivities overall. So do you disapprove of them because you think that the sexual weirdness is caused by being less godly and moral than the average lay person? or do you disapprove of them because you think that being less godly and moral than the average lay person causes sexual weirdness?
"Ah, this thread is truly the land of the open mind"
Wide, wide open it would seem... |
