SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (145708)4/21/2002 3:33:45 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) of 1575535
 
First of all, Clinton is not a liberal for one thing. He clearly brought the dem party to the center. True liberals like Nader atacked Clinton-Gore-Lieberman just as much as they did Bush-Cheney. He told us there was no difference (which was BS).

Secondly, if a President doesn't deserve full credit for 7 straight years of boom times then who does? Maybe you refuse to give him credit because you're jealous and hate it that he was right and the GOP was wrong, but facts are facts.

I'll leave you with a quote by Dick Armey circa 1991. "I for one will not take responsibility when this bill (Clinton's economic plan) brings down our economy. So the GOP gave all credit-blame to Clinton in 1991 for the economy. Well guess what? Can't have it both ways. Meanwhile the name Bush and recession are becoming synonymous. I fully expect the next 2-3 years to be slow or negative growth except in polluting energy sources and defence, which are Bush's only priorities, especially oil. However if the democrats take congress they can start to reverse the slide through more conservative fiscal management.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext