Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GraceZ who wrote (161342)	4/22/2002 11:58:48 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) of 436258

<<Buying high priced growth stocks wasn't engaging risk.>> Just thought that was worth reprinting so you could read what you wrote. No comment needed. <<They paid such a high premium for growth (they saw these stocks as inherently LESS risky that's why they paid up) that it effectively destroyed the return side.>> This is 100% backward... do you think the high price of .com IPO's forced them out of business??? LOL, no didn't think so... internet riches [expected growth] didn't materialize. <<Cheap is inherently risky, this is why people demand a higher return to engage it.>> Again... you're disagreeing with Greenspan [posted]... are you meaning to do that? << DROOY at a dollar was unbelievably risky, there were good reasons it was high risk and it was priced according to that risk.>> Can't disagree more... the stock is 4X the price now with POG up < 10%... the "reasons" you sight were perceived, the stock and group were out of favor plain and simple... as Heinz so eruditely pointed out at the time. <<The highest returns come from engaging risk. >> "Always" is never a good concept to use in real life... tell that to the .com stock owners. We clearly disagree, I'll just drop it. DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next