The problem is that there does not exist a "natural" way for two men to have sex.
I find it genuinely amazing that you actually claim, with some pride, that you are somehow a better person, one less deserving of social opprobrium, because your drive and passion is to put your penis into your [female] beloved's vaginal orifice, than is a gay male whose lover's orifice features no clitoris, but a prostate gland and various nerve ends which, when stimulated, yield a natural orgasm. The male body was, by nature, given the capacity to have anal orgasm. (It wasn't, by nature, given Viagra; do you hold Dole in opprobrium because he uses the unnatural Viagra to achieve orgasm, and give it?)
I take it that you think gays should restrict themselves to oral sex.
But wait: since that won't eventuate in ejaculation in a vagina, don't you "have problems" with that, too?
Why can't two gay men enjoy their affection, love, companionship, without rectal sex? Just because it "feels good" will not do it for me.
Well, what will "do it" for you, in the lovemaking of those others? Cuddling followed by mutual masturbation? Does that "do it" for you sufficiently that you will cease heaping opprobrium on your fellow citizens who are gay, and advocating that others do the same? Or would you require the masturbation to take place in separate rooms, facilitated only by fantasies of kissing, of oral sex, of anal sex, or of mutual masturbation?
Would the kissing part be okay done together with the snuggling, to be followed by repairing to separate rooms during masturbation?
If the above reads as ridiculous, it's because it's ridiculous, imo. If you advocate or defend inflicting social opprobrium on others for engaging in their sexual acts of choice instead of in yours, then you really do have an obligation to make clear exactly what those acts are and aren't. And look how absurd it is when you project yourself into their bedroom and begin directing traffic. |
