THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (10456)	4/23/2002 11:11:45 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 21057

"if "aversion to homosexuality" is the criterion for its application, there is the risk of labelling hundreds of millions at a time, beginning with all Christians, Jews, and Islamics." No. There would be no risk in labelling ALL of those; hmmmm--perhaps some... Certainly, it would not apply to all the homosexual Christians and Jews and Muslims; and what about priests?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next