SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Night Writer who wrote (97350)4/24/2002 3:08:24 PM
From: Night Writer  Read Replies (1) of 97611
 
Speaking in court on Tuesday, Neal argued that HP should
have disclosed that the numbers showed, among other things,
that 2003 operating profit would come in at $5.2 billion, not
$6.9 billion, as HP had publicly indicated in its documents to
shareholders ahead of the March 19 merger shareholder vote.
Fiorina said the lower estimates generated internally at HP
were not forecasts, saying that managers tended to
underestimate the numbers to ensure they met their targets.


Just looking at the numbers, that is about a 25% sandbag factor. In my experience, sandbag factors were normally lower then that. Given the $6.9 billion number already had roughly a 5% reduction, that would be about 30% less total. IMHO that should be a red flag to senior management. Some one like MC needs to dig into the guts and see if there are serious problems. On the other hand, maybe IT managers do try for huge sandbags.
NW
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext