SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dayuhan who wrote (10631)4/24/2002 9:05:09 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
A recent post (don't remember whose) cited a survey that found that 42% of Americans felt that homosexuality should be illegal. That seems quite reasonably close to "irrational and illogical" status.

I'm not one of those 42% but I don't know how many of them have their opinion because of fear or hold their opinion for irrational or illogical reasons.

If for example you felt 1 - that the highest and most important purpose of government was to promote morality, and 2 - that homosexual activity was immoral, then believing in 3 - The government should ban homosexual activity, is a logical conclusion.

Of course being logical doesn't save it from being wrong. I could come up with a whole series of valid logical arguments "proving" things that I think are wrong. I suppose that many of those 42% are at least somewhat illogical, but I don't see how a label assuming irrationality should be applied to all of them. I don't have enough hubris to think that believing in religious, or philosophical or moral ideas that I disagree with makes one irrational. Even on subjects like history or science where evidence is actually available I don't think that only one opinion can be rational or even that someone can not be incorrect without being irrational.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext