THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (10552)	4/24/2002 9:41:26 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) of 21057

I'm struggling to think of a way in which the world is better off that some of its human inhabitants prefer their own gender as sex partners. An hypothesis: There may have been an advantage in our harsh ancestral environment to the survival of family genes where one member's contributions of work, food, other survival benefits went to the nurturance of the children of siblings. Like having an assistant teacher in the classroom makes possible better learning for that class. The genetic logic for that individual is that his DNA is carried on in his nieces and nephews. Families whose genetic code spawned the occasional assistant might have found themselves ahead, when winter set it, in survival-probability, of their completely hetero neighbors, so that that family's children, in which there lies a latent gay gene, grow up to reproduce, including reproducing the occasional gay uncle or aunt. The gay uncle probably made the cave all cozy and attractive and painted neat animals on the walls to keep everyone's spirits up. Maybe he sang show tunes around the fire, and said witty things, too, and since laughing is good for the immune system of all his siblings' children....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next