SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 207.67+2.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (78329)4/24/2002 11:26:01 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Wanna: I compared the 1.73GHz Athlon XP with the 1.7GHz Willamette. To estimate Northwood, I multiply the result by the percentage that the 2.0A beats the 2.0 in each app, and I also include the percentage that the 2.4B beats the 2.4A in each app. The parenthesis represent negative IPC gains.

I think you may be overanalyzing (*cough*). Many of the benchmarks you cite are extremely memory bandwidth-sensitive. Others are extremely cache-sensitive. In both these cases, it is not unreasonable to assume that a Clawhammer will do very well (compared to an Athlon, given the higher bandwidth to memory, much lower latency to memory and larger L2 cache). Sledgehammer, with its 128bit memory controller will do extremely well. (I'll hold off on any claims of 1MB L2 cache until I see them - it occurs to me that we've heard that "chip-with-larger-L2-cache" a little too often).

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext