SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.00+0.7%Dec 22 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (78402)4/25/2002 8:16:57 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
wbmw,

McKinley seems to have killer bandwidth, which matters to database performance even more than CPU power. Actually, in my post to Tenchusatsu a while ago, I commented that in case of Itanium (2), it will be the strong chipset selling the systems, rather than strong CPU. The bandwidth, and the amount of memory you can have in a single McKinley system is impressive.

Itanium 2 is able to achieve almost 30% performance over the fastest .18u generation Xeon MP - with Hyperthreading.

What kind of systems were these? Were they maxed out on memory, disk performance? Was the cost the same? Would it be possible to apply the cost difference between the systems to, say more memory on Xeon system? Is the performance increase sufficient to justify with a non-standard system? These are the questions potential customers will ask.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext