Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (12197)	4/26/2002 4:38:08 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"Each of our souls is free and perfect. Whether we chose to see and believe this is another story. But this is the simple truth" No. It is not a "simple truth". It is a "simple" assertion made by a conditional human being who is wrong half the time just like the rest of us. "And we are called to receive and share the perfect, unconditional light, energy and love that our ONE Lord God in Heaven" Light, energy, and love are NOT unconditional. You are talking ridiculous. Nor is your assertion of a "ONE Lord God" other than a personal conceit offered without any justification or basis whatsoever. Arrogant and egoistical nonsense. Likewise, your pretense to know "heaven". Get off your high horse, Man! "It's just energy that we are called to receive and share with ZERO/NO conditions, etc." That is silly. Leaving aside the nature of this "energy" that you claim (AGAIN) to be "sharing"...any such "sharing" would be conditional upon an actual transference taking place. That would be conditional upon my acceptance and participation. Otherwise it would be intrusiveness, force, and aggression. "Sharing" is always conditional upon agreement. Forcing anything on anyone is not "sharing"...it is VIOLATING.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next