SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (97409)4/28/2002 4:26:48 AM
From: PCSS  Read Replies (1) of 97611
 
Hewlett suit a failure, H-P argues Company discloses final argument in merger trial
By Associated Press .... 5:44 PM ET April 27, 2002

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) -- Hewlett-Packard Co. heir Walter Hewlett fell far short of proving his lawsuit against the company and should abandon his fight to stop the merger with Compaq Computer Corp., H-P attorneys argued in a scathing legal brief.

The brief, filed Friday night and released by H-P on Saturday, was the equivalent of a closing argument after a three-day trial that ended Thursday in Wilmington, Del.

Hewlett offered no proof H-P (HWP: news, chart, profile) lied about the chances the Compaq (CPQ: news, chart, profile)deal could achieve its publicly released financial goals, the attorneys said. He also offered no tangible evidence that H-P threatened Deutsche Bank or coerced its investment managers into switching 17 million shares in favor of the deal, the brief said.

"They are pitching the bribery claim as a 'circumstantial' case with the subtlety and intrigue of an Oliver Stone screenplay," the H-P attorneys wrote.

"Carly Fiorina's philosophy in connection with this merger has been 'under-promise and over-deliver,"' the brief said, referring to the H-P CEO's testimony that the Compaq deal actually should exceed its stated goals. "Plaintiffs' performance in this lawsuit has been to 'over-promise and under-deliver."'

Attorneys for Hewlett, whose 15-year tenure on the H-P board ended Friday, also filed a post-trial brief with the court but hadn't released copies to reporters by Saturday afternoon.

Hewlett sued H-P in Chancery Court in Delaware, where H--P is incorporated, in hopes of overturning the March 19 shareholder vote, won by H-P 51.4 percent to 48.6 percent, according to an unofficial, preliminary tally.

Judge William B. Chandler III said Thursday he would rule quickly. If Chandler lets the $18.2 billion deal stand and H-P's victory in the proxy vote holds up, H-P and Compaq Computer Corp. are prepared to officially begin working together May 7.

H-P's lawyers asked Chandler to rule in the company's favor and also publicly vindicate "the integrity and moral rectitude" of Fiorina and Robert Wayman, H-P's chief financial officer.

"The time has come to force Walter Hewlett and his team to face reality," the H-P brief said. "They lost. It is time to stand down and allow these companies to get on with the work of implementing the integration planning."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext