SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Terms of Use: Are They Still Enforced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (22)5/1/2002 5:08:28 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (6) of 92
 
No
I don't think it is harassment
and no, it wasn't intentional (my not responding about it- I just thought there were more important points.)
I don't think she is harassing him either
although stirring up a gang of people comes close

PS- jewel's case, which I found to be more important as far as I am concrened, wasn't harassment either. I think it trivializes true harassment to construe anything that might happen to an alias on an internet site with words to be harassment, unless it is 1.physically threatening 2.obscene or 3. demanding some sort of 3d action. This is my opinion. I think tauntings (which regularly go on) and include vicious name calling are not true harassment. I think alluding to family and profession in libelous ways comes close- but then again, if one has an alias, as was pointed out to me by a RWET'ster, whose going to know? Indeed. Who is? Of course when one is the victim of name calling etc one might feel harassed, and I think all of us have felt harassed from time to time, but does feeling make it so? Not as far as I am concerned.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext