SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Baldur Fjvlnisson who wrote (3942)5/3/2002 1:59:03 AM
From: Mephisto   of 5185
 
New 'Enron Opportunity'
Los Angeles Times
EDITORIAL
April 29, 2002

E-mail story

Small investors raked by the Enron collapse are still
licking their wounds, and here comes Wall Street
with more scandal--investment companies accused
of giving misleading advice to investors in order to
bolster their own portfolios. Investor confidence
can't be restored without regulatory reform. As
made clear by the Enron case, that must include
assurance that auditors will be honest watchdogs of
corporate finance.

Legislation passed by the House Wednesday does
not go far enough, but the Democratic-led Senate
should resist the temptation to respond with virtuous
legislation that has no chance of becoming law.
Unless there is a reasonable compromise, nothing
will get passed in this election year, and the next
round of abuses will brew unseen. The auditing
industry has succeeded so far in muffling new regulations.
No wonder; the
nonpartisan Center on Responsive Politics reports that in 2000 the industry
shelled out $12.3 million in lobbying fees and $14.7 million in campaign
contributions. The industry is sponsoring a nationwide advertising campaign to
resist reform, even though Enron's sudden collapse showed in gruesome detail
the conflicts of interest that plague accounting firms. The accounting firm
Andersen, accused of helping to conceal Enron's financial woes, earned $52
million in consulting fees in 2000 from Enron that had nothing to do with auditing.
Probes into Merrill Lynch and Citigroup over their stock analysts'
recommendations may well uncover other auditing abuses.

What's needed is not a cosmetic tuck but major surgery. The GOP-backed
House legislation, which President Bush has endorsed, is only a start. It would
create a board under Securities and Exchange Commission oversight and force
companies to disclose transactions that did not appear on balance sheets, but it
would not directly attack accounting abuses.

Senate Democrats want to prohibit accountants from carrying out consulting
work for auditing clients, a step that is critical to reform. Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes
(D-Md.), the Banking Committee chairman, would provide a new board more
power to investigate auditing companies. Democrats hope to ban stock analysts
from trading in companies that they tout to investors, and, in a related measure,
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) is sponsoring a bill that would increase criminal
penalties for security fraud and require auditing companies to retain all
documents for five years.

Where Democrats are likely to have to make concessions is on the power of a
new auditing board. In any case, the board's effectiveness comes down to the
willingness of SEC Chairman Harvey L. Pitt to use new regulations to police the
industry aggressively.


None of this will matter if no reforms are passed. House Democratic Minority
Leader Richard A. Gephardt has already made it clear he will use the flawed
GOP bill as an election-year club to bash Republicans as corporate lackeys. He
should first seek an honest compromise. As with campaign finance reform,
Enron created an opportunity. Shame on lawmakers if they don't seize it.

latimes.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext