Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (28239)	5/4/2002 5:07:11 AM
From: tekboy	Read Replies (2) of 281500

re Iraq's non-involvement if there were some justice in these things, the people who blathered on and on about Iraq's involvement in the 9/11 attacks (Woolsey, Mylroie, Safire, practically every neocon on the planet) would pay a significant price in terms of credibility now that their pet theory has been debunked. (Even the supposed meeting of Atta with an Iraqi agent in Prague now seems to have been a case of mistaken identity.) Yet they haven't, because popular debate has few intellectual standards and they are shameless enough to simply move on to the next topic without comment. Well, at least the smart ones are. The Weekly Standard, in contrast, just had a major piece trying to argue that foreigners, read Iraq, were behind the anthrax mailings, something that will very likely be debunked for good fairly soon.... ctb/A@pssst:SaddamkilledVinceFoster,passiton.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next