Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (28336)	5/4/2002 8:25:46 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (3) of 281500

First of all, don't bite my head off, I was interpreting the remark. Nope, you were quite clearly making the remark. You do take the cake, Nadine. You find a way to get back to Paul's comment and then criticize my reaction to it. Biting your head off would have been to make the same observations about your anti-Palestinian posts. As for the substance, I still find Tony Judt's arguments the most persuasive, that for Israel to continue the occupation is to place themselves in the same jeopardy as the French in Algeria. Thus, the two state solution with the 67 borders is the most security possible. The remainder of your observations about recognition of Israel is an obvious part of that solution. I've always assumed that's packaged into the "land for peace" talk. As for your convictions that no deal is possible with Arafat, it also seems likely, with the same degree of conviction that no deal is possible with Sharon or Netanyahu in power. Either something absolutely extraordinary happens (which is obviously more than unlikely) or serious peace awaits serious power changes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next