Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 231.80

+1.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dan3 who wrote (79397)	5/5/2002 1:51:14 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Dan, "Or, just buy AMD chips instead of Intel chips, and save yourself thousands or millions in software costs. Software costs that gain you nothing except the ability to run your existing programs at full speed on Intel's new chips." I fail to see any reason for such a statement. Any CPU core stalls when waiting for memory. Two cores would stall either while taking more silicon area than a single core with Hyper-Threading. "Aye, there's the rub. Not a matter of re-compiling, but one of creating a new structure and execution flow for the application, then re-writing the application following the new design." I worded it that it would "require thorough re-thinking and re-engineering of all individual applications." This apparently means somewhat more than a simple matter of re-compiling. However, if the trend towards dual-processors will continue, this job will be eventually done anyway, and Intel will have an instant advantage in performance and die size compared to any "true" dual-processor implementations. "AMD's new chips already run your existing programs at full speed." What do you mean? Which chips? - Ali

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next