Will Barrick cover a short, 23 million ounces of gold?
or
Best to ask if its "in the cards"
and if so,
"Could Barrick cover short position of 23 million ounces
even if it wanted to?"
groups.yahoo.com
* IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION * Please Read The Following
This above article is the "same" as
Message from long-gone
Derivatives may be the real bomb
Barrick Gold answers queries about 'mark to market'
By Thom Calandra, CBS.MarketWatch.com
BUT,
Differences exist in these two "cut & paste" of the total text,
meaning,
for sure whatever text is present using the url is "it"
BUT,
why the difference
or,
as Silicon Investor instructed me in an e-mail
"... supply only an introduction or summary with url..."
which would solve the issue we now have,
meaning,
"Reader Beware" of full cut(s) & paste(s)
but then, as i mentioned, few read these posts
that "wallpaper" this thread since once one does
that View Next 10 and get these posts that contain
not an opinion or summary of a long article, but the whole
page after pages of text to fill a small book, that many do
as i do and simply move on to the next post as a reflex
that includes NOT reading this huge cut & paste,
like a reflex to push away someone pushing something
at you without any introduction. So guess what, after my
visit to yahoo gata groups and seeing above article i wondered
why this thread did not have this important info posted.
So i took the time to re-look at this thread a second time,
and golly gee, then it was, that post i "next'ed" as a reflex
to those other off-topic and stupid-topic wall-pappered posts.
But it was a good one, but got run-over and ignored using that
reverse hick-hiker problem where 1 in a 1,000 you pick up to
give a ride is a bad guy gonna do you harm, and them 999
wallpaper posts prevented this good "one."
ok,
BUT these them there differences might "tell a story"
as in, "what changed" might give insight.
yes
ak |
