SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (51005)5/7/2002 12:23:08 AM
From: pbull  Read Replies (1) of 65232
 
Nuclear attack? Let's think this through.
If I were in the insurance biz (as Buffett is), then yes, I would be talking about nuclear attack because, particularly at this point in history, there is heightened awareness that such a thing might possibly be attempted.
The two largest obstacles are 1. intelligence (CIA) and 2. military readiness. Both are significant obstacles, in my opinion.
This reminds me of the rational for skyrocketing insurance premiums in California back in the late '80s, early '90s because of the certainty that, one day, the "big one" would occur (earthquake), and that California would fall into the sea.
That hype roughly coincided with the bottom in the California real estate market.
Buffett's willingness to allow his company to write policies against further terrorist attacks speaks volumes, to me, at least. I'm a fan of Buffett, don't get me wrong, but business is business.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext