SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : AMAT Off-Topic Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (744)5/7/2002 7:53:58 AM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (1) of 786
 
Required reading from the NY Times:

Israel Has Nothing to Hide

By YUVAL STEINITZ

AIFA, Israel — What changed Israel's initial decision to accept a United Nations "fact-finding
committee" on the Jenin refugee camp into a furious rejection?

From the beginning, Israel's acceptance of the committee was tinged with grave misgivings. The United
Nations has long since lost any claim to impartiality with respect to Israel. The anti-Semitic conference on
racism it sponsored in Durban last summer is but one example of ingrained bias against Israel. Nevertheless,
Israelis were so confident that an honest fact finding would exonerate Israel of the wild charges being made by
Palestinians and humanitarian organizations that they initially acquiesced to the proposal.

However, when the committee mandate and composition were finally revealed, they convinced Israelis across
the political spectrum that Secretary General Kofi Annan had set a trap for Israel.

In order to render a fair and unbiased judgment on the conduct of any military operation, two basic conditions
must be met. First, the operation must be placed in the context of the causes that gave rise to it. Without that
context, no judgment on the proportionality of the response is possible. Second, the operation must be
assessed in comparison to other such military actions.

Yet the United Nations committee was asked to examine the Israeli Defense
Force's actions in Jenin and the suffering of Jenin's inhabitants without
reference to the earlier terrorism coming out of the Jenin camp that had
triggered the Israeli action. In short, the committee would evaluate Israel's
war on terrorism without any reference to terrorism.

Imagine a team sent to investigate American military action in Afghanistan
without reference to the attacks of Sept. 11 or Osama bin Laden's boasts
that he would destroy America. And imagine asking that investigation to
ignore the sanctuary the Taliban gave Mr. bin Laden and his Qaeda
operatives despite previous American warnings.

Stripped of that context, the United States would inevitably be found guilty of
having assaulted one of the poorest and most backward countries on the face
of the earth and of inflicting unnecessary harm on the civilian population. A
similar inquiry into the massive allied bombing of Germany in World War II
would have resulted in charges of war crimes against Franklin D. Roosevelt
and Winston Churchill.

But this kind of distorted result is exactly what the United Nations'
noncontextual fact-hiding strategy would have arrived at. To examine the Israeli operations in Jenin and at
similar sites with no reference to the nonstop Palestinian suicide bombings and other terrorist attacks
dispatched from those sites — these attacks killed more than 100 Israeli civilians in March alone, a number
that translates for tiny Israel to the equivalent of twice the number of Americans killed on Sept. 11 — suggests
an intent to find Israel guilty in advance.

The second major flaw was hidden in the committee composition: most of its members possessed no military
background. Moreover, there was no indication that the military operation would be assessed in comparison
to other military operations with similar missions; for example, by comparing civilian casualties in Jenin to
civilian casualties inflicted by the Russian ground forces in Chechnya or by the American air forces in
Afghanistan.

Israelis are confident that any fair comparative examination of the Israeli Defense Force actions in Jenin would
show that the soldiers made extraordinary efforts to minimize civilian casualties in the nine-day battle there.
Twenty-three Israeli infantrymen would be alive today had the army made a decision to use its airplanes and
artillery to wipe out the armed opposition more quickly.

Israel has nothing to hide. Israel rejected the United Nations fact-finding committee not because of what the
committee sought to explore, but because of what it was determined to ignore.

Yuval Steinitz is chairman of the subcommittee for defense planning and policy of the Israeli Knesset.

fred
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext