THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (12333)	5/7/2002 1:17:56 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) of 21057

Don't agree with what? She violated the TOU. There are more and less serious violations of the second account rule. Some are done for nefarious reasons, some as a lark. This violation was of the second kind. Once it was brought to Jeff's attention, he had to sanction her in some way. My opinion is that 15 days was a harsh choice, but hey, it's no big deal, except that the context creates significant irony. What do you think of this post by CH, who, as you must know, has repeatedly made clear his intention of making Poet's life uncomfortable enough so that she will be forced to give him what he wants. Message 17422314 CH wants to be left alone to sort out his relationship with someone who won't speak to him: Message 17421794 CH wants something from Poet he isn't getting: Message 17415627 Message 17415593

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next