You are implying something unpleasant about Poet, I see, but what that might be, you don't specify.
Are you aware that Poet doesn't deny that a suspension for a second accn't is required by the TOU, and neither do I?
Okay, let's say the irony of Poet getting suspended for 15 days for the year old violation, IMO probably on a report for which CH is responsible (though not via his own account), while CH gets to post such stuff as is on the link below to her and she is told SI won't help her, she must take it to the law, escapes you.
Just in a vacuum, ironies aside, do you think CH should be allowed, w/o sanction, since his threat to sue SI made them take the toorabout they had on CH and Poet off, to post such things to Poet as this?
What do you think of just this single post by CH, who, as you must know, has repeatedly made clear his intention of making Poet's life uncomfortable enough so that she will be forced to give him what he wants.
Message 17422314 |
