SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (253437)5/7/2002 5:27:55 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
I agree that civil forfeiture is ridiculously over- broad. I even agree that there is too much incarceration for users and small fry dealers. But I do not think that there is much reason to worry about the Feds. For one thing, if they were so militarized, I think that interdiction would be more effective. For another, certain situations require special weapons and tactics teams, and SWAT teams would be involved even if it were a municipal bust. For the rest, it is a sheer matter of speculation. If you think, as I do, that social costs of flooding the country with drugs will exceed the costs of enforcement, especially if enforcement is fine- tuned to eliminate specific evils, then you will be in favor of a version of the War on Drugs. Otherwise, not. My argument is that we are in a dreadfully self- indulgent society, and the potential for increased consumption and even greater dissipation of character and judgment is very great, if drugs are readily available.......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext